
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

RTX A1000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+49.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A1000 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 60W.
RTX A1000 Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 160W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,463 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019RTX A1000 Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅+49.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 160W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A1000 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 160W vs 60W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,463 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than RTX A1000 Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A1000 Mobile make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 75 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and RTX A1000 Mobile

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

RTX A1000 Mobile
RTX A1000 Mobile
The RTX A1000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,463 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the RTX A1000 Mobile's 9,463 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 49.1%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the RTX A1000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2,048 (RTX A1000 Mobile). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4.669 TFLOPS (RTX A1000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1140 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 16 (RTX A1000 Mobile) with 240 Tensor cores vs 64.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+49% | 9,463 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2048+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+38% | 4.669 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+47% | 1140 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120+88% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB | 2 MB+5% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30+88% | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 240+275% | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A1000 Mobile supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A1000 Mobile has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2 MB (RTX A1000 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the RTX A1000 Mobile's 60W — a 90.9% difference. The RTX A1000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (RTX A1000 Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 60W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 113mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 72-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 157.7+79% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A1000 Mobile is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | — |
| Codename | TU106 | GA107 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #168 | #277 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













