
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

RTX A400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+135.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌158.5% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$135 MSRP
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
RTX A400
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $214 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,983 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019RTX A400
2024Why buy it
- ✅+135.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $214 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌158.5% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$135 MSRP
- ❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,983 vs 14,114).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than RTX A400?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A400 make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 67 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and RTX A400

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

RTX A400
RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the RTX A400's 5,983 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 135.9%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1762 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6 (RTX A400) with 240 Tensor cores vs 24.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+136% | 5,983 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+150% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS+138% | 2.706 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 1762 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 120+400% | 24 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30+400% | 6 |
| Tensor Cores | 240+900% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A400 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A400 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 113mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 72 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 119.7+36% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the RTX A400 launched at $135. The RTX A400 costs 61.3% less ($214 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the RTX A400 offers 9.7% better value. The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | $135-61% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 44.3+10% |
| Codename | TU106 | GA107 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #168 | #397 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













