
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Tesla M40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+38.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,151 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 889.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Tesla M40
2015Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,220 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌616.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Tesla M40
2015Why buy it
- ✅+38.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,151 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 889.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,220 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌616.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Tesla M40?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M40 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 307 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 230 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 115 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Tesla M40

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Tesla M40
Tesla M40
The Tesla M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,220 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 versus the Tesla M40's 10,220 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 38.1%. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Tesla M40 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114+38% | 10,220 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3072+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 6.832 TFLOPS+6% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz+51% | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 120 | 192+60% |
| L1 Cache | 1.9 MB+73% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M40 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M40 has 8 GB. The Tesla M40 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.0 (Tesla M40). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M40). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Tesla M40).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Tesla M40's 250W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Tesla M40). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-36% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-15% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+116% | 40.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Tesla M40 launched at $2500. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 86% less ($2151 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4.1 (Tesla M40) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 885.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-86% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+885% | 4.1 |
| Codename | TU106 | GM200 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #168 | #256 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













