G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

✅27.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design

2019

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

✅27.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design better than RTX A2000 Embedded GPU?

Yes. GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 27.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 3.1% higher PassMark G3D performance, DLSS 2 Super Resolution, and 288 vs 80 Tensor cores. It also comes from 2019 instead of 2022, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of DLSS Super Resolution, and a 8nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 27.8% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 3.1% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, RTX A2000 Embedded GPU still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does RTX A2000 Embedded GPU make more sense than GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design?

Yes. RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (35W vs 80W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design currently gives you 3.1% higher G3D Mark and 27.8% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	110 FPS	105 FPS
medium	93 FPS	88 FPS
high	77 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	49 FPS
1440p
low	94 FPS	91 FPS
medium	79 FPS	75 FPS
high	59 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	36 FPS
4K
low	38 FPS	36 FPS
medium	34 FPS	33 FPS
high	21 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	18 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design Open RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	252 FPS	124 FPS
medium	213 FPS	100 FPS
high	173 FPS	80 FPS
ultra	148 FPS	61 FPS
1440p
low	196 FPS	90 FPS
medium	162 FPS	70 FPS
high	131 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	44 FPS
4K
low	114 FPS	55 FPS
medium	98 FPS	43 FPS
high	77 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	26 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design Open RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	516 FPS	500 FPS
medium	413 FPS	400 FPS
high	344 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	258 FPS	250 FPS
1440p
low	387 FPS	375 FPS
medium	309 FPS	300 FPS
high	258 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	188 FPS
4K
low	258 FPS	250 FPS
medium	206 FPS	200 FPS
high	172 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	129 FPS	125 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design Open RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	239 FPS	229 FPS
medium	206 FPS	196 FPS
high	166 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	133 FPS
1440p
low	186 FPS	176 FPS
medium	164 FPS	153 FPS
high	128 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	98 FPS
4K
low	108 FPS	99 FPS
medium	90 FPS	78 FPS
high	73 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design Open RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design and RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 885 MHz to 1185 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,461 points.

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 607 MHz to 1177 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,117 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design scores 11,461 and the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU reaches 11,117 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 2,560 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 5.46 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 6.026 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1185 MHz vs 1177 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 20 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) with 288 Tensor cores vs 80.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score	11,461+3%	11,117
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	2304	2560+11%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.46 TFLOPS	6.026 TFLOPS+10%
Boost Clock	1185 MHz	1177 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	144+80%	80
L1 Cache	2.3 MB	2.5 MB+9%
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	36+80%	20
Tensor Cores	288+260%	80

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 2 MB (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) — the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.1	1.4+27%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 78.3% difference. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 82mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
TDP	80W	35W-56%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	82mm
Height	0mm	4mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	143.3	317.6+122%