GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design

2019Core: 735 MHzBoost: 1095 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

2019Core: 600 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz
Similar parts
···

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

  • 7.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design instead at 12,766 vs 12,675, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 16 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) and DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025), while GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is limited to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and no comparable frame-generation support, and 48 vs 46 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design vs Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1095 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,766 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,675 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design scores 12,766 and the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design reaches 12,675 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 6.447 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1095 MHz vs 1350 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 48 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) with 368 Tensor cores vs 384.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignQuadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score
12,766
12,675
Architecture
Turing
Turing
Process Node
12 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2944
3072+4%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.447 TFLOPS
8.294 TFLOPS+29%
Boost Clock
1095 MHz
1350 MHz+23%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
184
192+4%
L1 Cache
2.9 MB
3 MB+3%
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
46
48+4%
Tensor Cores
368
384+4%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignQuadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 4)
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design carries 16 GB. Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignQuadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignQuadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
DirectX
12 (12_2)
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design).

FeatureGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignQuadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Encoder
NVENC 6
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
NVDEC 4
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 0% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q DesignQuadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
TDP
80W
80W
Recommended PSU
0W-100%
500W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80
80°C
Perf/Watt
159.6
158.4