
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU vs RTX A2000 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

RTX A2000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU is positioned at rank 40 and the RTX A2000 Mobile is on rank 214, so the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Performance Per Dollar RTX A2000 Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A2000 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A2000 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU and RTX A2000 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1740 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,489 points. Launch price was $199.

RTX A2000 Mobile
The RTX A2000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1687 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,506 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU scores 9,489 and the RTX A2000 Mobile reaches 9,506 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the RTX A2000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU) vs 2,560 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Raw compute: 7.127 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU) vs 8.637 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1740 MHz vs 1687 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU) vs 20 (RTX A2000 Mobile) with 64 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,489 | 9,506 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.127 TFLOPS | 8.637 TFLOPS+21% |
| Boost Clock | 1740 MHz+3% | 1687 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 2.5 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 20+25% |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 80+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RTX A2000 Mobile relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU draws 90W versus the RTX A2000 Mobile's 95W — a 5.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU) vs 500W (RTX A2000 Mobile). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W-5% | 95W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 105.4+5% | 100.1 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















