GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VS
GeForce GTX 980

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce GTX 980

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980

2014Core: 1064 MHzBoost: 1216 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
112%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
112%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
111%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
110%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
109%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
109%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
107%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
107%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
107%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
106%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
105%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
103%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
103%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
102%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
101%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
100%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
100%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
99%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
99%
#26
Radeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
99%
#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
99%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
98%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
98%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
98%
#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
98%
#32
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
97%
#33
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
96%
#34
Radeon RX 5300
MSRP: $129|Avg: $50
94%
#35
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP: $150|Avg: $77
93%
#36
Radeon RX 6400
MSRP: $159|Avg: $139
93%
#37
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
MSRP: $599|Avg: $330
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is significantly newer (2024 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 980 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 980 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce GTX 980
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%)
Leading raw performance (+3.1%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 980 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $179 for the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB, it costs 72% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 268.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce GTX 980
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+268.9%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($179)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and GeForce GTX 980

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980

The GeForce GTX 980 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1064 MHz to 1216 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,077 points. Launch price was $549.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 and the GeForce GTX 980 reaches 11,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 980 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,048 (GeForce GTX 980). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4.981 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1216 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce GTX 980
G3D Mark Score
10,749
11,077+3%
Architecture
Ampere
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2304+13%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS+36%
4.981 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1470 MHz+21%
1216 MHz
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
72
128+78%
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+207%
0.75 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 980 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce GTX 980
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2.0
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 980 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 980. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce GTX 980
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
224 GB/s+33%
Bus Width
96-bit
256-bit+167%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce GTX 980
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce GTX 980
Encoder
NVENC (5th Gen)
NVENC 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC (7th Gen)
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce GTX 980's 220W — a 103.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 980). Power connectors: None vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce GTX 980
TDP
70W-68%
220W
Recommended PSU
300W-40%
500W
Power Connector
None
2x 6-pin
Length
160mm
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
153.6+205%
50.4
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP and currently averages $179, while the GeForce GTX 980 launched at $549 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTX 980 costs 72.1% less ($129 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.1 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 221.5 (GeForce GTX 980) — the GeForce GTX 980 offers 268.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGeForce GTX 980
MSRP
$169-69%
$549
Avg Price (30d)
$179
$50-72%
Performance per Dollar
60.1
221.5+269%
Codename
GA107
GM204
Release
February 2 2024
September 19 2014
Ranking
#252
#245