G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Tesla M40 24GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Tesla M40 24GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,831 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1095.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Tesla M40 24GB

2015

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
1083.4% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 10,641), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,831 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1095.4% (63.6 vs 5.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Tesla M40 24GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Tesla M40 24GB

The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 and the Tesla M40 24GB reaches 10,641 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Tesla M40 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1112 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla M40 24GB
G3D Mark Score	10,749+1%	10,641
Architecture	Ampere	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2304	3072+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS	6.832 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1470 MHz+32%	1112 MHz
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	72	192+167%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+109%	1.1 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla M40 24GB leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla M40 24GB
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M40 24GB carries 8 GB. Tesla M40 24GB gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 256-bit on the Tesla M40 24GB. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40 24GB) — the Tesla M40 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla M40 24GB
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	96-bit	256-bit+167%
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla M40 24GB
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla M40 24GB
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	NVENC 4.0 (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Tesla M40 24GB). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla M40 24GB
TDP	70W-72%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	267mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	153.6+261%	42.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Tesla M40 24GB launched at $2000. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 91.5% cheaper ($1831 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.3 (Tesla M40 24GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1100% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Tesla M40 24GB
MSRP	$169-92%	$2000
Performance per Dollar	63.6+1100%	5.3
Codename	GA107	GM200
Release	February 2 2024	November 10 2015
Ranking	#252	#253

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Search Tesla M40 24GB on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.