GeForce GTX 980 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980

2014Core: 1064 MHzBoost: 1216 MHz
Similar parts
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······

GeForce GTX 980 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 980 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 980 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 980

2014

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 224.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $549 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • 16.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $380 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
  • Delivers 215.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 16.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 980 instead at 11,077 vs 10,749, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $380 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $549, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 215.2% (63.6 vs 20.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 980 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980

The GeForce GTX 980 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1064 MHz to 1216 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,077 points. Launch price was $549.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 980 scores 11,077 and the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB reaches 10,749 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 4.981 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1216 MHz vs 1470 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score
11,077+3%
10,749
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
2048
2304+13%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.981 TFLOPS
6.774 TFLOPS+36%
Boost Clock
1216 MHz
1470 MHz+21%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
128+78%
72
L1 Cache
0.75 MB
2.3 MB+207%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 980 is capped at Upscaling support.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 980 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 980. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 980 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
6 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s+33%
168 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+167%
96-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX
12.1
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

FeatureGeForce GTX 980GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder
NVENC 3.0
NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 980 draws 220W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 103.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 980) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP
220W
70W-68%
Recommended PSU
500W
300W-40%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
None
Length
267mm
160mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
50.4
153.6+205%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 980 came in at $549, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 69.2% cheaper ($380 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.2 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 214.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 980GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP
$549
$169-69%
Performance per Dollar
20.2
63.6+215%
Codename
GM204
GA107
Release
September 19 2014
February 2 2024
Ranking
#245
#252

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.