
GeForce GTX 980

Radeon Pro Vega 48
GeForce GTX 980 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 980 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 980 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 980
2014Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Pro Vega 48 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 980 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega 48 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌22% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.2 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌633.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 30W.
Radeon Pro Vega 48
2019Why buy it
- ✅19.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 220W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 980 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 980
The GeForce GTX 980 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1064 MHz to 1216 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,077 points. Launch price was $549.

Radeon Pro Vega 48
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,270 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980 scores 11,077 and the Radeon Pro Vega 48 reaches 11,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 3,072 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Raw compute: 4.981 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Boost clocks: 1216 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,077 | 11,270+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3072+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.981 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS+60% |
| Boost Clock | 1216 MHz | 1300 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 192+50% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 980 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 980 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 980 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 48. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 980) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the Radeon Pro Vega 48 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 48).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 draws 220W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 48's 30W — a 152% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 980) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 30W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 50.4 | 375.7+645% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 980 came in at $549, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 launched at $450. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega 48 was 18% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.2 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 25.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the Radeon Pro Vega 48 offers 23.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro Vega 48 (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | $450-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.2 | 25.0+24% |
| Codename | GM204 | Vega 10 |
| Release | September 19 2014 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #245 | #241 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














