GeForce GTX 980 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980

2014Core: 1064 MHzBoost: 1216 MHz
Similar parts
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 48

2019Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1300 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 980 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 980 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 980 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 980

2014

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon Pro Vega 48 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 980 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega 48 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 22% HIGHER MSRP
    $549 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.2 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • 633.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 30W.

Radeon Pro Vega 48

2019

Why buy it

  • 19.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $99 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
  • Delivers 24.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 220W, a 190W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro Vega 48 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (11,270 vs 11,077), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 980 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro Vega 48 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $99 cheaper on MSRP at $450 vs $549, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 24.1% (25.0 vs 20.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Radeon Pro Vega 48 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 980 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 980 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980

The GeForce GTX 980 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1064 MHz to 1216 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,077 points. Launch price was $549.

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 48

The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,270 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 980 scores 11,077 and the Radeon Pro Vega 48 reaches 11,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 3,072 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Raw compute: 4.981 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Boost clocks: 1216 MHz vs 1300 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Radeon Pro Vega 48
G3D Mark Score
11,077
11,270+2%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 5.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048
3072+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.981 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS+60%
Boost Clock
1216 MHz
1300 MHz+7%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
128
192+50%
L1 Cache
768 KB
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 980 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Radeon Pro Vega 48
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 980 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 980 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 980 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 48. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 980) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the Radeon Pro Vega 48 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Radeon Pro Vega 48
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Radeon Pro Vega 48
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 48).

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Radeon Pro Vega 48
Encoder
NVENC 3.0
VCE 4.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
UVD 7.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 980 draws 220W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 48's 30W — a 152% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 980) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Radeon Pro Vega 48
TDP
220W
30W-86%
Recommended PSU
500W
1W-100%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
Integrated
Length
267mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
50.4
375.7+645%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 980 came in at $549, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 launched at $450. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega 48 was 18% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.2 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 25.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the Radeon Pro Vega 48 offers 23.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro Vega 48 (2019 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Radeon Pro Vega 48
MSRP
$549
$450-18%
Performance per Dollar
20.2
25.0+24%
Codename
GM204
Vega 10
Release
September 19 2014
March 19 2019
Ranking
#245
#241

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.