GeForce GTX 980 vs Radeon Pro SSG

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980

2014Core: 1064 MHzBoost: 1216 MHz
Similar parts
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro SSG

2016Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 980 vs Radeon Pro SSG Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 980 vs Radeon Pro SSG FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 980 vs Radeon Pro SSG: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 980

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $6,450 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1187.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
  • Draws 220W instead of 260W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro SSG across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon Pro SSG

2016

Why buy it

  • 47.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 1174.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $6,999 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
  • 18.2% higher power demand at 260W vs 220W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro SSG is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 47.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 980 instead at 11,077 vs 10,972, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 980 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 980 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $6,450 cheaper on MSRP at $549 vs $6,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1187.1% (20.2 vs 1.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro SSG still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 980 vs Radeon Pro SSG Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980

The GeForce GTX 980 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1064 MHz to 1216 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,077 points. Launch price was $549.

AMD

Radeon Pro SSG

The Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,972 points. Launch price was $9,999.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 980 scores 11,077 and the Radeon Pro SSG reaches 10,972 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro SSG uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro SSG). Raw compute: 4.981 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro SSG). Boost clocks: 1216 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Radeon Pro SSG
G3D Mark Score
11,077
10,972
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048
4096+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.981 TFLOPS
8.602 TFLOPS+73%
Boost Clock
1216 MHz+16%
1050 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
128
256+100%
L1 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 980 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro SSG leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Radeon Pro SSG
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 980 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro SSG carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro SSG gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 980 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro SSG. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 980) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro SSG) — the Radeon Pro SSG has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Radeon Pro SSG
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro SSG). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Radeon Pro SSG
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro SSG). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro SSG).

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Radeon Pro SSG
Encoder
NVENC 3.0
VCE 4.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
UVD 7.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 980 draws 220W versus the Radeon Pro SSG's 260W — a 16.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 980 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 980) vs 500W (Radeon Pro SSG). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Radeon Pro SSG
TDP
220W-15%
260W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
50.4+19%
42.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 980 came in at $549, while the Radeon Pro SSG launched at $6999. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 980 was 92.2% cheaper ($6450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.2 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 1.6 (Radeon Pro SSG) — the GeForce GTX 980 offers 1162.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro SSG (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Radeon Pro SSG
MSRP
$549-92%
$6999
Performance per Dollar
20.2+1162%
1.6
Codename
GM204
Fiji
Release
September 19 2014
July 26 2016
Ranking
#245
#249

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.