GeForce GTX 980 vs Quadro P4000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980

2014Core: 1064 MHzBoost: 1216 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P4000

2017Core: 1202 MHzBoost: 1480 MHz

GeForce GTX 980 vs Quadro P4000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 980 vs Quadro P4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 980 vs Quadro P4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 980

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $266 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
  • Delivers 43.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.2 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro P4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 109.5% higher power demand at 220W vs 105W.
  • 10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

Quadro P4000

2017

Why buy it

  • 32.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Draws 105W instead of 220W, a 115W reduction.
  • Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 48.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $815 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($815 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro P4000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 32.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (11,431 vs 11,077), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 980 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 980 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $266 cheaper on MSRP at $549 vs $815, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 43.9% (20.2 vs 14.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro P4000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 980 vs Quadro P4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980

The GeForce GTX 980 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1064 MHz to 1216 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,077 points. Launch price was $549.

NVIDIA

Quadro P4000

The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 980 scores 11,077 and the Quadro P4000 reaches 11,431 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P4000 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 1,792 (Quadro P4000). Raw compute: 4.981 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980) vs 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000). Boost clocks: 1216 MHz vs 1480 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Quadro P4000
G3D Mark Score
11,077
11,431+3%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
2048+14%
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.981 TFLOPS
5.304 TFLOPS+6%
Boost Clock
1216 MHz
1480 MHz+22%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
128+14%
112
L1 Cache
768 KB+14%
672 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 980 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P4000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Quadro P4000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 980 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P4000 carries 8 GB. Quadro P4000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 980 and 256-bit on the Quadro P4000.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Quadro P4000
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 12.0 (Quadro P4000). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Quadro P4000
DirectX
12.1
12.0
Vulkan
1.1+10%
1.0
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Quadro P4000
Encoder
NVENC 3.0
6th Gen NVENC
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 980 draws 220W versus the Quadro P4000's 105W — a 70.8% difference. The Quadro P4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 980) vs 500W (Quadro P4000). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Quadro P4000
TDP
220W
105W-52%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
241mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
50.4
108.9+116%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 980 came in at $549, while the Quadro P4000 launched at $815. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 980 was 32.6% cheaper ($266 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.2 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 14.0 (Quadro P4000) — the GeForce GTX 980 offers 44.3% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P4000 (2017 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 980Quadro P4000
MSRP
$549-33%
$815
Performance per Dollar
20.2+44%
14.0
Codename
GM204
GP104
Release
September 19 2014
February 6 2017
Ranking
#245
#239

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.