G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro P4200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro P4200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,031 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 635.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,200 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 100W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌52.4% longer card at 160mm vs 105mm.

Quadro P4200

2018

Why buy it

✅18.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅Measures 105mm instead of 160mm, a 55mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
610.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,200 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,200 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌42.9% higher power demand at 100W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P4200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce RTX 3050 6GB instead at 10,749 vs 10,376, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 16nm, 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2018. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,031 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $1,200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 635.6% (63.6 vs 8.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro P4200 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro P4200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro P4200

The Quadro P4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,376 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 and the Quadro P4200 reaches 10,376 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro P4200 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,304 (Quadro P4200). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1647 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P4200
G3D Mark Score	10,749+4%	10,376
Architecture	Ampere	Pascal
Process Node	8 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	2304	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS	7.589 TFLOPS+12%
Boost Clock	1470 MHz	1647 MHz+12%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	72	144+100%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+174%	0.84 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P4200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P4200
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P4200 carries 8 GB. Quadro P4200 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 256-bit on the Quadro P4200.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P4200
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	96-bit	256-bit+167%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (Quadro P4200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P4200
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P4200). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.265,H.264,VP9 (Quadro P4200).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P4200
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	H.265,H.264,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro P4200's 100W — a 35.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Quadro P4200). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 105mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P4200
TDP	70W-30%	100W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	105mm
Height	—	82mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80
Perf/Watt	153.6+48%	103.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Quadro P4200 launched at $1200. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 85.9% cheaper ($1031 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8.6 (Quadro P4200) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 639.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2018).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P4200
MSRP	$169-86%	$1200
Performance per Dollar	63.6+640%	8.6
Codename	GA107	GP104
Release	February 2 2024	February 21 2018
Ranking	#252	#266

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Search Quadro P4200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.