
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce RTX 4060

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 81.9% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-81.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+81.9%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $299 (vs $179), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 8.9% better value per dollar than the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+8.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($179) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and GeForce RTX 4060

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 81.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2460 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 24 (GeForce RTX 4060) with 72 Tensor cores vs 96.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 19,548+82% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3072+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+123% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2460 MHz+67% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 72 | 96+33% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 3 MB+30% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 24 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 24+33% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 96+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 61.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 272 GB/s+62% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 24 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 48.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-39% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-45% | 550W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 73°C-3% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 170.0+11% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP and currently averages $179, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 and now averages $299. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 40.1% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 60.1 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 8.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-43% | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $179-40% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 60.1 | 65.4+9% |
| Codename | GA107 | AD107 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














