
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $330 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 39.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 165W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 240mm, a 80mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅133.9% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌195.3% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 45.5 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌135.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 70W.
- ❌50% longer card at 240mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $330 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 39.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 45.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 165W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 240mm, a 80mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅133.9% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌195.3% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 45.5 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌135.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 70W.
- ❌50% longer card at 240mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 66 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 888 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 628 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 511 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 676 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 312 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 256 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 256 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 22,713 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB leads by 111.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) with 72 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 22,713+111% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4352+89% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+226% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2535 MHz+72% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 72 | 136+89% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 4.3 MB+87% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 34+89% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 136+89% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — a 71.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 288 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 165W — a 80.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 160mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2.2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-58% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-45% | 550W |
| Power Connector | None | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 160mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-9% | 2.2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+12% | 137.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB launched at $499. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 66.1% less ($330 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 45.5 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 39.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-66% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+40% | 45.5 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD106 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #56 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












