
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $630 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 59.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 285W, a 215W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 310mm, a 150mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅177.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌372.8% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.8 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌307.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 70W.
- ❌93.8% longer card at 310mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 31,828 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER leads by 196.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 66 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) with 72 Tensor cores vs 264.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 31,828+196% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 8448+267% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 44.1 TFLOPS+551% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2610 MHz+78% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 72 | 264+267% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 8.3 MB+261% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 66+267% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 264+267% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER carries 16 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — a 300% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 672 GB/s+300% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 48 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 8th gen (Dual) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 285W — a 121.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Power connectors: None vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 160mm vs 310mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-75% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-60% | 750W |
| Power Connector | None | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 160mm | 310mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 72°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+38% | 111.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at $799. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 78.8% cheaper ($630 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 39.8 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 59.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-79% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+60% | 39.8 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD103 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #252 | #10 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














