G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅8724.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 205021.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌180% higher power demand at 70W vs 25W.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 70W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8724.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 268625% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 4), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 12nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 more expensive on MSRP at $169 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 205021.4% (63.6 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GeForce2 MX/MX 400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GeForce2 MX/MX 400's 4 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 268625%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 896 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1575 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
G3D Mark Score	10,749+268625%	4
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Process Node	8 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	2304+157%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+110%	3.226 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1470 MHz	1575 MHz+7%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	72+13%	64

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the GeForce2 MX/MX 400.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+1100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	96-bit+50%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 7.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
DirectX	12 Ultimate+71%	7.0
OpenGL	4.6+283%	1.2
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs None (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	None
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	MPEG-2 Decoder
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GeForce2 MX/MX 400's 25W — a 94.7% difference. The GeForce2 MX/MX 400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (GeForce2 MX/MX 400). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 55°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
TDP	70W	25W-64%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	—
Height	—	100mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C	55°C-27%
Perf/Watt	153.6+76700%	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the GeForce2 MX/MX 400 launched at $129. On MSRP, GeForce2 MX/MX 400 was 23.7% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.0 (GeForce2 MX/MX 400) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2020).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GeForce2 MX/MX 400
MSRP	$169	$129-24%
Performance per Dollar	63.6	0.0
Codename	GA107	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Release	February 2 2024	August 1 2020
Ranking	#252	#523

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Search GeForce2 MX/MX 400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.