
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+95.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,500 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
2023Why buy it
- ✅+95.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,500 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 57 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)'s 5,500 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 95.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) uses Xe LPG, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1950 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+95% | 5,500 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe LPG |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+57500% | 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1950 MHz+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12_2 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs QuickSync (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)'s 15W — a 129.4% difference. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 15W-79% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 366.7+139% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) launched at $0. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) costs 100+% less ($169 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs Infinity (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) — the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA107 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Release | February 2 2024 | December 14 2023 |
| Ranking | #252 | #494 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












