Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GRID K140Q

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS

GRID K140Q

2013Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GRID K140Q Performance Spectrum

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
6 GB 70
10,749
+1376.5%
brand logoGeForce GTX 770
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX Titan
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080
GRID K140Q
0.5 GB 225
728
0.0%
brand logoGeForce 8800 GTS
brand logoGeForce GT 625M
brand logoGeForce GT 720A
brand logoGeForce GTS 360M
brand logoGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GRID K140Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • ✅+1376.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Delivers 992.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
  • ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
  • ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GRID K140Q

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $44 less on MSRP ($125 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (728 vs 10,749).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1376.5% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 728), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $44 more expensive on MSRP at $169 vs $125, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 992.1% (63.6 vs 5.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GRID K140Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

NVIDIA

GRID K140Q

The GRID K140Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 728 points. Launch price was $469.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GRID K140Q's 728 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 1376.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GRID K140Q uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,536 (GRID K140Q). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K140Q).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K140Q
G3D Mark Score
10,749+1377%
728
Architecture
Ampere
Kepler
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2304+50%
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS+196%
2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
72
128+78%
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+1669%
0.13 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID K140Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K140Q
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K140Q carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the GRID K140Q. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K140Q) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K140Q
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+1100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
96-bit+50%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 11_0 (GRID K140Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K140Q
DirectX
12 Ultimate+9%
11_0
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 3rd Gen (GRID K140Q). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 1st Gen.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K140Q
Encoder
NVENC (5th Gen)
NVENC 3rd Gen
Decoder
NVDEC (7th Gen)
NVDEC 1st Gen
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
—
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GRID K140Q's 225W — a 105.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (GRID K140Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K140Q
TDP
70W-69%
225W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
160mm
267mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
75°C
—
Perf/Watt
153.6+4700%
3.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the GRID K140Q launched at $125. On MSRP, GRID K140Q was 26% cheaper ($44 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.8 (GRID K140Q) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 996.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBGRID K140Q
MSRP
$169
$125-26%
Performance per Dollar
63.6+997%
5.8
Codename
GA107
GK104
Release
February 2 2024
June 28 2013
Ranking
#252
#628
Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on AmazonSearch GRID K140Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.