GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs GRID V100D-8Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅+158.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $9,831 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 15204% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GRID V100D-8Q

2016

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,156 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
5817.2% HIGHER MSRP
$10,000 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

GRID V100D-8Q

2016

Why buy it

✅+158.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $9,831 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 15204% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,156 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
5817.2% HIGHER MSRP
$10,000 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than GRID V100D-8Q?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,749 vs 4,156 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while GRID V100D-8Q is a 2016 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016, 158.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is about $9,831 cheaper on MSRP at $169 MSRP versus $10,000 MSRP, and you are getting 158.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 15204%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is GRID V100D-8Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GRID V100D-8Q is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $10,000 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

GRID V100D-8Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GRID V100D-8Q
1080p
low	85 FPS	30 FPS
medium	72 FPS	17 FPS
high	60 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	5 FPS
1440p
low	74 FPS	14 FPS
medium	64 FPS	7 FPS
high	47 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	2 FPS
4K
low	27 FPS	5 FPS
medium	25 FPS	3 FPS
high	17 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open GRID V100D-8Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GRID V100D-8Q
1080p
low	174 FPS	82 FPS
medium	149 FPS	51 FPS
high	118 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	24 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	36 FPS
medium	106 FPS	25 FPS
high	83 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	12 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	11 FPS
medium	62 FPS	9 FPS
high	48 FPS	7 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	5 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open GRID V100D-8Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GRID V100D-8Q
1080p
low	484 FPS	187 FPS
medium	387 FPS	150 FPS
high	322 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	363 FPS	140 FPS
medium	290 FPS	112 FPS
high	242 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	70 FPS
4K
low	242 FPS	94 FPS
medium	193 FPS	75 FPS
high	161 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	47 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open GRID V100D-8Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GRID V100D-8Q
1080p
low	243 FPS	177 FPS
medium	210 FPS	143 FPS
high	171 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	185 FPS	124 FPS
medium	166 FPS	104 FPS
high	131 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	70 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	72 FPS
medium	87 FPS	57 FPS
high	69 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	36 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open GRID V100D-8Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and GRID V100D-8Q

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

GRID V100D-8Q

The GRID V100D-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,156 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the GRID V100D-8Q's 4,156 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 158.6%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the GRID V100D-8Q uses Maxwell, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 640 (GRID V100D-8Q). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100D-8Q). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1306 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GRID V100D-8Q
G3D Mark Score	10,749+159%	4,156
Architecture	Ampere	Maxwell
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2304+260%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+305%	1.672 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1470 MHz+13%	1306 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	72+80%	40
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+642%	0.31 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID V100D-8Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GRID V100D-8Q
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GRID V100D-8Q has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GRID V100D-8Q
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	96-bit+50%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the GRID V100D-8Q's 225W — a 105.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (GRID V100D-8Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	GRID V100D-8Q
TDP	70W-69%	225W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	153.6+730%	18.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the GRID V100D-8Q launched at $10000. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 98.3% less ($9831 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.4 (GRID V100D-8Q) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 15800% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).