GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Intel Arc Pro A60

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
Intel

Intel Arc Pro A60

2023Core: 900 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz
Similar parts
·····

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Intel Arc Pro A60 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Intel Arc Pro A60 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Intel Arc Pro A60: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • 21.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $211 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
  • Delivers 154.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Intel Arc Pro A60

2023

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 124.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $380 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($380 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 13.2% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 9,493), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, 18 vs 16 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2023. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $211 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $380, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 154.6% (63.6 vs 25.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Intel Arc Pro A60 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Intel

Intel Arc Pro A60

The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Intel Arc Pro A60's 9,493 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 13.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Intel Arc Pro A60 uses Generation 12.7, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2050 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 16 (Intel Arc Pro A60) with 72 Tensor cores vs 256.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBIntel Arc Pro A60
G3D Mark Score
10,749+13%
9,493
Architecture
Ampere
Generation 12.7
Process Node
8 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
2304+13%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS
8.397 TFLOPS+24%
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
2050 MHz+39%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
72
128+78%
L2 Cache
2 MB
12 MB+500%
Ray Tracing Cores
18+13%
16
Tensor Cores
72
256+256%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel Arc Pro A60 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBIntel Arc Pro A60
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and System on the Intel Arc Pro A60. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBIntel Arc Pro A60
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
System
Bus Width
96-bit
System
L2 Cache
2 MB
12 MB+500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBIntel Arc Pro A60
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs Intel Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBIntel Arc Pro A60
Encoder
NVENC (5th Gen)
Intel Xe Media Engine
Decoder
NVDEC (7th Gen)
Intel Xe Media Engine
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Intel Arc Pro A60's 130W — a 60% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBIntel Arc Pro A60
TDP
70W-46%
130W
Recommended PSU
300W-40%
500W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
160mm
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
153.6+110%
73.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 launched at $380. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 55.5% cheaper ($211 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 154.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2023).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBIntel Arc Pro A60
MSRP
$169-56%
$380
Performance per Dollar
63.6+154%
25.0
Codename
GA107
DG2-256
Release
February 2 2024
June 6 2023
Ranking
#252
#275

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.