
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Intel Arc Pro B50
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Intel Arc Pro B50 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Intel Arc Pro B50 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Intel Arc Pro B50: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 81.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 167mm, a 7mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Intel Arc Pro B50 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Intel Arc Pro B50 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅7.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌106.5% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Intel Arc Pro B50 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 12,208 — the Intel Arc Pro B50 leads by 13.6%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Intel Arc Pro B50 uses Xe2, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 16 (Intel Arc Pro B50) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 12,208+14% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 10.65 TFLOPS+57% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2600 MHz+77% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 72 | 128+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18+13% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel Arc Pro B50 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 carries 8 GB. Intel Arc Pro B50 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 128-bit on the Intel Arc Pro B50. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the Intel Arc Pro B50 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs Dual Arc Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 70W — a 0% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 167mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 174.4+14% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 51.6% cheaper ($180 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 81.7% better value. The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro B50 (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-52% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+82% | 35.0 |
| Codename | GA107 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #252 | #221 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














