
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- β +445.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 77.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 35.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ampere (2020β2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β180% higher power demand at 70W vs 25W.
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2020Why buy it
- β Costs $114 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- β Draws 25W instead of 70W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,972 vs 10,749).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2020Why buy it
- β +445.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 77.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 35.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ampere (2020β2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Costs $114 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- β Draws 25W instead of 70W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β180% higher power demand at 70W vs 25W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,972 vs 10,749).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($55 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Iris Xe MAX Graphics?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Iris Xe MAX Graphics still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 22 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 22 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Iris Xe MAX Graphics

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 31 2020. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,972 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Iris Xe MAX Graphics's 1,972 β the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 445.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Iris Xe MAX Graphics uses Generation 12.1, both on 8 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 768 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.534 TFLOPS (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+445% | 1,972 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+200% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+167% | 2.534 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1650 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 32+33% | 24 |
| TMUs | 72+50% | 48 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe MAX Graphics has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1 MB (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) β the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Iris Xe MAX Graphics's 25W β a 94.7% difference. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1W (Iris Xe MAX Graphics). Power connectors: None vs Integrated. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75Β°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 25W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | None | Integrated |
| Length | 160mm | 0mm |
| Height | β | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75Β°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+95% | 78.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Iris Xe MAX Graphics launched at $55. The Iris Xe MAX Graphics costs 67.5% less ($114 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 35.9 (Iris Xe MAX Graphics) β the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 77.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Iris Xe MAX Graphics |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $55-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+77% | 35.9 |
| Codename | GA107 | DG1 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | October 31 2020 |
| Ranking | #252 | #686 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












