GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs NVS 510

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS

NVS 510

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs NVS 510 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs NVS 510: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • +1480.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $280 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
  • Delivers 4099.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

NVS 510

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (680 vs 10,749).
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 165.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $449 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1480.7% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 680), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $280 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $449, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4099.7% (63.6 vs 1.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs NVS 510 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

NVIDIA

NVS 510

The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the NVS 510's 680 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 1480.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the NVS 510 uses Maxwell, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 512 (NVS 510). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 510). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1033 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBNVS 510
G3D Mark Score
10,749+1481%
680
Architecture
Ampere
Maxwell
Process Node
8 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2304+350%
512 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS+540%
1.058 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock
1470 MHz+42%
1033 MHz
ROPs
32+100%
16 ×2
TMUs
72+125%
32 ×2
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+820%
0.25 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The NVS 510 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBNVS 510
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the NVS 510 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the NVS 510. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1 MB (NVS 510) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBNVS 510
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+200%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
96-bit+50%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (11_0) (NVS 510). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBNVS 510
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1st Gen NVENC (NVS 510). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (NVS 510).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBNVS 510
Encoder
NVENC (5th Gen)
1st Gen NVENC
Decoder
NVDEC (7th Gen)
1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the NVS 510's 68W — a 2.9% difference. The NVS 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (NVS 510). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBNVS 510
TDP
70W
68W-3%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
160mm
160mm
Height
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
75°C
65°C-13%
Perf/Watt
153.6+1436%
10.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the NVS 510 launched at $449. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 62.4% cheaper ($280 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.5 (NVS 510) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 4140% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBNVS 510
MSRP
$169-62%
$449
Performance per Dollar
63.6+4140%
1.5
Codename
GA107
GM107
Release
February 2 2024
November 4 2015
Ranking
#252
#826

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.