
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

P106-100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+62.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $55 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 115% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 29.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
P106-100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,628 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌32.5% HIGHER MSRP$224 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024P106-100
2017Why buy it
- ✅+62.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $55 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 115% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 29.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,628 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌32.5% HIGHER MSRP$224 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than P106-100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is P106-100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 75 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 72 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and P106-100

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

P106-100
P106-100
The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the P106-100's 6,628 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 62.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the P106-100 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,920 (P106-100). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+62% | 6,628 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+20% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+2% | 6.655 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1733 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 120+67% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+229% | 0.7 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The P106-100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the P106-100 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12_1 (P106-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC 3rd Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the P106-100's 75W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (P106-100). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 250mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-7% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 250mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+74% | 88.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the P106-100 launched at $224. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 24.6% less ($55 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 29.6 (P106-100) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 114.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-25% | $224 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+115% | 29.6 |
| Codename | GA107 | GP104 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | December 12 2017 |
| Ranking | #252 | #529 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












