
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Quadro 2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+1033.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $430 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3918.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 1 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quadro 2000
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (948 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌254.4% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Quadro 2000
2010Why buy it
- ✅+1033.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $430 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3918.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 1 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (948 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌254.4% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Quadro 2000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro 2000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 11 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Quadro 2000

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro 2000
Quadro 2000
The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro 2000's 948 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 1033.9%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro 2000 uses Fermi, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 192 (Quadro 2000). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+1034% | 948 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Fermi |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+1100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+1311% | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 72+125% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+820% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro 2000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 has 1 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro 2000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+500% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 11_0 (Quadro 2000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro 2000). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VP4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro 2000's 62W — a 12.1% difference. The Quadro 2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Quadro 2000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 178mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 62W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 178mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+904% | 15.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Quadro 2000 launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 71.8% less ($430 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.6 (Quadro 2000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 3875% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-72% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+3875% | 1.6 |
| Codename | GA107 | GF106 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | December 24 2010 |
| Ranking | #252 | #902 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












