GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro 2000D

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 2000D

2011Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro 2000D Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro 2000D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro 2000D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • 699.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $430 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 3787.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quadro 2000D

2011

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2011 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 254.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $599 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 699.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 996.8% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 980), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 40nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $430 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3787.6% (63.6 vs 1.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro 2000D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000D

The Quadro 2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 980 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro 2000D's 980 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 996.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro 2000D uses Fermi, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 192 (Quadro 2000D). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000D).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro 2000D
G3D Mark Score
10,749+997%
980
Architecture
Ampere
Fermi
Process Node
8 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2304+1100%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS+1311%
0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
72+125%
32
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+820%
0.25 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 2000D leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro 2000D
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000D carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the Quadro 2000D. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro 2000D) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro 2000D
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
96-bit+50%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro 2000D's 62W — a 12.1% difference. The Quadro 2000D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Quadro 2000D). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro 2000D
TDP
70W
62W-11%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
160mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
153.6+872%
15.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Quadro 2000D launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 71.8% cheaper ($430 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.6 (Quadro 2000D) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 3875% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro 2000D
MSRP
$169-72%
$599
Performance per Dollar
63.6+3875%
1.6
Codename
GA107
GF106
Release
February 2 2024
October 5 2011
Ranking
#252
#892

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.