
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Quadro FX 2000
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 2000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 2000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅8724.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,831 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1059959.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅4700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 128 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quadro FX 2000
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1675.1% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 2000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro FX 2000
The Quadro FX 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro FX 2000's 18 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 59616.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro FX 2000 uses Fermi, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 192 (Quadro FX 2000). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro FX 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+59617% | 18 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Fermi |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+1100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+1311% | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 72+125% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+820% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 2000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro FX 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2000 carries 128 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 4700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 2000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro FX 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+4700% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro FX 2000's 62W — a 12.1% difference. The Quadro FX 2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro FX 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 62W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+51100% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Quadro FX 2000 launched at $3000. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 94.4% cheaper ($2831 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.0 (Quadro FX 2000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro FX 2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-94% | $3000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GA107 | GF106 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | December 24 2010 |
| Ranking | #252 | #902 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














