GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 2000

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2000

2010Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 2000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • 8724.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $2,831 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1059959.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 4700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quadro FX 2000

2010

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 1675.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,000 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8724.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 59616.7% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 18), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 128 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 40nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,831 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1059959.2% (63.6 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro FX 2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 2000

The Quadro FX 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro FX 2000's 18 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 59616.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro FX 2000 uses Fermi, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 192 (Quadro FX 2000). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2000).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro FX 2000
G3D Mark Score
10,749+59617%
18
Architecture
Ampere
Fermi
Process Node
8 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2304+1100%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS+1311%
0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
72+125%
32
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+820%
0.25 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 2000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro FX 2000
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2000 carries 128 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 4700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 2000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro FX 2000
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+4700%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
96-bit+50%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro FX 2000's 62W — a 12.1% difference. The Quadro FX 2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro FX 2000
TDP
70W
62W-11%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
160mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
153.6+51100%
0.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Quadro FX 2000 launched at $3000. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 94.4% cheaper ($2831 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.0 (Quadro FX 2000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro FX 2000
MSRP
$169-94%
$3000
Performance per Dollar
63.6
0.0
Codename
GA107
GF106
Release
February 2 2024
December 24 2010
Ranking
#252
#902

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.