GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro K600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro K600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro K600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅456.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1653.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quadro K600

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
17.8% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$169 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 456.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1388.8% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 722), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1653.1% (63.6 vs 3.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro K600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro K600

The Quadro K600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 722 points. Launch price was $5,265.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro K600's 722 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 1388.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro K600 uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,880 (Quadro K600). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K600). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 902 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro K600
G3D Mark Score	10,749+1389%	722
Architecture	Ampere	Kepler
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2304	2880+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+30%	5.196 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1470 MHz+63%	902 MHz
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	72	240+233%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+900%	0.23 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+33%	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro K600
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K600 carries 1 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the Quadro K600. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro K600) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro K600
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+500%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	96-bit+50%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+33%	1.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro K600's 225W — a 105.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Quadro K600). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro K600
TDP	70W-69%	225W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	153.6+4700%	3.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Quadro K600 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 15.1% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3.6 (Quadro K600) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1666.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro K600
MSRP	$169-15%	$199
Performance per Dollar	63.6+1667%	3.6
Codename	GA107	GK110B
Release	February 2 2024	July 23 2013
Ranking	#252	#318

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Search Quadro K600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.