
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Quadro P2200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+14.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $260 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 190.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 5 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quadro P2200
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,386 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌153.8% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Quadro P2200
2019Why buy it
- ✅+14.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $260 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 190.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 5 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,386 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌153.8% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Quadro P2200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P2200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 60 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 28 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Quadro P2200

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200
The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro P2200's 9,386 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 14.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro P2200 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,280 (Quadro P2200). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1493 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+15% | 9,386 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+80% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+77% | 3.822 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1493 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 72 | 80+11% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+389% | 0.47 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+60% | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P2200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2200 has 5 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 20% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+20% | 5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+60% | 1.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (Quadro P2200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro P2200's 75W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Quadro P2200). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 201mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-7% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 201mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+23% | 125.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Quadro P2200 launched at $429. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 60.6% less ($260 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 21.9 (Quadro P2200) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 190.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P2200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-61% | $429 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+190% | 21.9 |
| Codename | GA107 | GP106 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | June 10 2019 |
| Ranking | #252 | #281 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












