G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro P3000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro P3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅+68.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $431 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 497.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quadro P3000

2016

Why buy it

✅15.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,384 vs 10,749).
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
255% HIGHER MSRP
$600 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.6 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P3000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce RTX 3050 6GB instead at 10,749 vs 6,384, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 16nm, 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $431 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $600, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 497.8% (63.6 vs 10.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro P3000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro P3000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro P3000

The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro P3000's 6,384 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 68.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro P3000 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3,840 (Quadro P3000). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1645 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P3000
G3D Mark Score	10,749+68%	6,384
Architecture	Ampere	Pascal
Process Node	8 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	2304	3840+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS	12.63 TFLOPS+86%
Boost Clock	1470 MHz	1645 MHz+12%
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	72	240+233%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+64%	1.4 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P3000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P3000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 6 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 256-bit on the Quadro P3000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3 MB (Quadro P3000) — the Quadro P3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P3000
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	6 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	96-bit	256-bit+167%
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P3000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P3000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P3000
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro P3000's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Quadro P3000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P3000
TDP	70W-72%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	153.6+502%	25.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Quadro P3000 launched at $600. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 71.8% cheaper ($431 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 10.6 (Quadro P3000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 500% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P3000
MSRP	$169-72%	$600
Performance per Dollar	63.6+500%	10.6
Codename	GA107	GP102
Release	February 2 2024	October 1 2016
Ranking	#252	#141

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Search Quadro P3000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.