G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅23.1% more average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

2018

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

2018

Why buy it

✅23.1% more average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Quadro P3200 Max-Q?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB averages 23.1% more FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 10,749 vs 6,500 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a 2018 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2018, 65.4% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $169 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 23.1% more estimated average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data and 65.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro P3200 Max-Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro P3200 Max-Q is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

Quadro P3200 Max-Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
1080p
low	85 FPS	84 FPS
medium	72 FPS	72 FPS
high	60 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	74 FPS	73 FPS
medium	64 FPS	64 FPS
high	47 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	31 FPS
4K
low	27 FPS	26 FPS
medium	25 FPS	25 FPS
high	17 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
1080p
low	174 FPS	210 FPS
medium	149 FPS	179 FPS
high	118 FPS	136 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	109 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	160 FPS
medium	106 FPS	134 FPS
high	83 FPS	107 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	85 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	94 FPS
medium	62 FPS	77 FPS
high	48 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	49 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
1080p
low	484 FPS	292 FPS
medium	387 FPS	234 FPS
high	322 FPS	195 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	146 FPS
1440p
low	363 FPS	219 FPS
medium	290 FPS	176 FPS
high	242 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	110 FPS
4K
low	242 FPS	146 FPS
medium	193 FPS	117 FPS
high	161 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	73 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Quadro P3200 Max-Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
1080p
low	243 FPS	166 FPS
medium	210 FPS	133 FPS
high	171 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	185 FPS	118 FPS
medium	166 FPS	96 FPS
high	131 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	67 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	65 FPS
medium	87 FPS	51 FPS
high	69 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	29 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Quadro P3200 Max-Q

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro P3200 Max-Q's 6,500 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 65.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro P3200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1404 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	10,749+65%	6,500
Architecture	Ampere	Pascal
Process Node	8 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	2304+29%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+35%	5.032 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1470 MHz+5%	1404 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	72	112+56%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+248%	0.66 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+33%	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3200 Max-Q has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	96-bit	256-bit+167%
L2 Cache	2 MB+33%	1.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro P3200 Max-Q's 75W — a 6.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.