
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Quadro P5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,330 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1148.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 12,728).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅+18.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1378.7% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,330 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1148.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+18.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 12,728).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1378.7% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P5000 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Quadro P5000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 73 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 340 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 104 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Quadro P5000

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro P5000's 12,728 — the Quadro P5000 leads by 18.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro P5000 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 12,728+18% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+31% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1733 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 160+122% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+145% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5000 has 16 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) — a 71.4% advantage for the Quadro P5000. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 288 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro P5000's 180W — a 88% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Quadro P5000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-61% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+117% | 70.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Quadro P5000 launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 93.2% less ($2330 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.1 (Quadro P5000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1147.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-93% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+1147% | 5.1 |
| Codename | GA107 | GP104 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #252 | #206 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












