
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Quadro P5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 173% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 11,650).
Quadro P5200
2018Why buy it
- ✅+8.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌195.9% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Quadro P5200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $331 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 173% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 23.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅+8.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,749 vs 11,650).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌195.9% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P5200 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Quadro P5200?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 77 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Quadro P5200

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro P5200's 11,650 — the Quadro P5200 leads by 8.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro P5200 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1746 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 11,650+8% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 8.94 TFLOPS+32% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1746 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 160+122% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+145% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | PureVideo HD VP7 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro P5200's 100W — a 35.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Quadro P5200). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-30% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+32% | 116.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Quadro P5200 launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 66.2% less ($331 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 23.3 (Quadro P5200) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 173% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-66% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+173% | 23.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | GP104 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #252 | #230 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












