G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro P6000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro P6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2359.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quadro P6000

2016

Why buy it

✅77.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅290.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2016 hardware with 23 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
3449.7% HIGHER MSRP
$5,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 77.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 44.3% in PassMark G3D (15,512 vs 10,749), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 16nm, 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,830 cheaper on MSRP at $169 vs $5,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2359.8% (63.6 vs 2.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro P6000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro P6000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro P6000

The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro P6000's 15,512 — the Quadro P6000 leads by 44.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro P6000 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3,840 (Quadro P6000). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1645 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P6000
G3D Mark Score	10,749	15,512+44%
Architecture	Ampere	Pascal
Process Node	8 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	2304	3840+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS	12.63 TFLOPS+86%
Boost Clock	1470 MHz	1645 MHz+12%
ROPs	32	96+200%
TMUs	72	240+233%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+64%	1.4 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P6000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P6000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P6000 carries 23 GB. Quadro P6000 gives you 290.6% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) — a 157.1% advantage for the Quadro P6000. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 384-bit on the Quadro P6000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3 MB (Quadro P6000) — the Quadro P6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P6000
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	23.438 GB+291%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5X
Memory Bandwidth	168 GB/s	432 GB/s+157%
Bus Width	96-bit	384-bit+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.1 (Quadro P6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P6000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P6000
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	NVENC 5.0 (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro P6000's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (Quadro P6000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P6000
TDP	70W-72%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-54%	650W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	153.6+148%	62.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Quadro P6000 launched at $5999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB was 97.2% cheaper ($5830 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.6 (Quadro P6000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 2346.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Quadro P6000
MSRP	$169-97%	$5999
Performance per Dollar	63.6+2346%	2.6
Codename	GA107	GP102
Release	February 2 2024	October 1 2016
Ranking	#252	#141

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Search Quadro P6000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.