GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Quadro RTX 8000

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 8000

2018Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1770 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $9,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 3091.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 70W instead of 260W, a 190W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 8000 across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

Quadro RTX 8000

2018

Why buy it

  • 141.4% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 700% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 72).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 48 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 5816.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $9,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • 271.4% higher power demand at 260W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX 8000 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Yes. Quadro RTX 8000 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Quadro RTX 8000 averages 141.4% more FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 19,927 vs 10,749 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Quadro RTX 8000 is a 2018 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2018, better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 8nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro RTX 8000 is about 5816.6% more expensive on MSRP at $9,999 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and you are getting 141.4% more estimated average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data and 85.4% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Quadro RTX 8000 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Quadro RTX 8000?
Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (70W vs 260W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $169 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro RTX 8000. The trade-off is that Quadro RTX 8000 currently gives you 85.4% higher G3D Mark and 141.4% more estimated average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX 8000
1080p
low109 FPS205 FPS
medium92 FPS190 FPS
high77 FPS166 FPS
ultra45 FPS151 FPS
1440p
low95 FPS187 FPS
medium81 FPS158 FPS
high59 FPS130 FPS
ultra34 FPS121 FPS
4K
low30 FPS119 FPS
medium28 FPS100 FPS
high19 FPS77 FPS
ultra16 FPS70 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX 8000
1080p
low174 FPS499 FPS
medium149 FPS442 FPS
high118 FPS343 FPS
ultra87 FPS289 FPS
1440p
low129 FPS325 FPS
medium106 FPS274 FPS
high83 FPS223 FPS
ultra62 FPS183 FPS
4K
low74 FPS153 FPS
medium62 FPS135 FPS
high48 FPS113 FPS
ultra34 FPS90 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX 8000
1080p
low484 FPS897 FPS
medium387 FPS717 FPS
high322 FPS598 FPS
ultra242 FPS448 FPS
1440p
low363 FPS673 FPS
medium290 FPS538 FPS
high242 FPS448 FPS
ultra181 FPS336 FPS
4K
low242 FPS448 FPS
medium193 FPS359 FPS
high161 FPS299 FPS
ultra121 FPS224 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX 8000
1080p
low243 FPS673 FPS
medium210 FPS605 FPS
high171 FPS515 FPS
ultra144 FPS448 FPS
1440p
low185 FPS544 FPS
medium166 FPS487 FPS
high131 FPS418 FPS
ultra109 FPS336 FPS
4K
low104 FPS355 FPS
medium87 FPS323 FPS
high69 FPS297 FPS
ultra55 FPS224 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Quadro RTX 8000

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 8000

The Quadro RTX 8000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,927 points. Launch price was $9,999.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro RTX 8000's 19,927 — the Quadro RTX 8000 leads by 85.4%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 8000 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 8000). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 8000). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 8000) with 72 Tensor cores vs 576.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX 8000
G3D Mark Score
10,749
19,927+85%
Architecture
Ampere
Turing
Process Node
8 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2304
4608+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS+141%
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
1770 MHz+20%
ROPs
32
96+200%
TMUs
72
288+300%
L1 Cache
2.3 MB
4.5 MB+96%
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB+200%
Ray Tracing Cores
18
72+300%
Tensor Cores
72
576+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The Quadro RTX 8000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX 8000
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 8000 has 48 GB. The Quadro RTX 8000 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 8000) — a 357.1% advantage for the Quadro RTX 8000. Bus width: 96-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 8000) — the Quadro RTX 8000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX 8000
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
48 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
768 GB/s+357%
Bus Width
96-bit
384-bit+300%
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB+200%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 8000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX 8000
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 8000). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 8000).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX 8000
Encoder
NVENC (5th Gen)
NVENC 7.0
Decoder
NVDEC (7th Gen)
PureVideo HD VP10
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro RTX 8000's 260W — a 115.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 8000). Power connectors: None vs 1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX 8000
TDP
70W-73%
260W
Recommended PSU
300W-54%
650W
Power Connector
None
1x 8-pin + 1x 6-pin
Length
160mm
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
153.6+101%
76.6
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 8000 launched at $9999. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 98.3% less ($9830 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.0 (Quadro RTX 8000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 3080% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBQuadro RTX 8000
MSRP
$169-98%
$9999
Performance per Dollar
63.6+3080%
2.0
Codename
GA107
TU102
Release
February 2 2024
August 13 2018
Ranking
#252
#78