
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX A6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,480 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1197% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quadro RTX A6000
2020Why buy it
- ✅172.7% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅366.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 72).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌2650.9% HIGHER MSRP$4,649 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Quadro RTX A6000
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,480 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1197% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅172.7% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅366.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 72).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌2650.9% HIGHER MSRP$4,649 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX A6000 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Quadro RTX A6000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 158 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 929 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 675 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 586 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 256 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 855 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 784 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 684 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 616 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 513 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 256 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Quadro RTX A6000

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000
The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 22,798 — the Quadro RTX A6000 leads by 112.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1800 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 84 (Quadro RTX A6000) with 72 Tensor cores vs 336.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 22,798+112% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 10752+367% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 38.71 TFLOPS+471% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 1800 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 32 | 112+250% |
| TMUs | 72 | 336+367% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 10.5 MB+357% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 84+367% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 336+367% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX A6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX A6000 has 48 GB. The Quadro RTX A6000 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) — a 357.1% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Bus width: 96-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) — the Quadro RTX A6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 48 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 768 GB/s+357% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 384-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 300W — a 124.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Quadro RTX A6000). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-77% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin EPS |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+102% | 76.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 96.4% less ($4480 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4.9 (Quadro RTX A6000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1198% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-96% | $4649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+1198% | 4.9 |
| Codename | GA107 | GA102 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | October 5 2020 |
| Ranking | #252 | #54 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












