
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Quadro T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅65.2% more average FPS across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $231 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 291.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 160mm, a 4mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌136.7% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅65.2% more average FPS across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $231 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 291.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 160mm, a 4mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌136.7% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Quadro T1000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro T1000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Quadro T1000

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Quadro T1000's 6,505 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 65.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+65% | 6,505 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+1% | 1455 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro T1000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T1000 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 33.3% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 50W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 156mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+18% | 130.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Quadro T1000 launched at $400. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 57.8% less ($231 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 16.3 (Quadro T1000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 290.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-58% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+290% | 16.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | TU117 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #252 | #376 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












