
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon 530
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅789.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
Radeon 530
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon 530
2017Why buy it
- ✅789.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon 530?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon 530 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 12 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 2 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon 530

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon 530
Radeon 530
The Radeon 530 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,037 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon 530's 1,037 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 936.5%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon 530 uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 384 (Radeon 530). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 530). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+937% | 1,037 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+500% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+761% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+44% | 1024 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 72+200% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+2456% | 0.09 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+1438% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 530 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 530 has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon 530) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+1438% | 0.13 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon 530). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon 530). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265 (Decode),VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon 530).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,H.265 (Decode),VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon 530's 50W — a 33.3% difference. The Radeon 530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Radeon 530). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 50W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+642% | 20.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon 530 launched at $0. The Radeon 530 costs 100+% less ($169 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs Infinity (Radeon 530) — the Radeon 530 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA107 | Weston |
| Release | February 2 2024 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #252 | #873 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












