
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon 8040S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅42.2% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $231 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 160.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 24.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌27.3% higher power demand at 70W vs 55W.
Radeon 8040S
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 70W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌136.7% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.4 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon 8040S
2025Why buy it
- ✅42.2% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $231 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 160.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 24.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 70W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌27.3% higher power demand at 70W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌136.7% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.4 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon 8040S?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 8040S make more sense than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 57 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 46 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon 8040S

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon 8040S
Radeon 8040S
The Radeon 8040S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,756 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon 8040S's 9,756 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 10.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon 8040S uses RDNA 3.5, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,024 (Radeon 8040S). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.734 TFLOPS (Radeon 8040S). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2800 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 16 (Radeon 8040S) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+10% | 9,756 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+125% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+18% | 5.734 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2800 MHz+90% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72+13% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18+13% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 8040S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 8040S has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8 MB (Radeon 8040S) — the Radeon 8040S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon 8040S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8040S). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8040S).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 4.5 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 4.5 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon 8040S's 55W — a 24% difference. The Radeon 8040S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 500W (Radeon 8040S). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 55W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6 | 177.4+15% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon 8040S launched at $400. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 57.8% less ($231 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 24.4 (Radeon 8040S) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 160.7% better value. The Radeon 8040S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-58% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+161% | 24.4 |
| Codename | GA107 | Strix Halo |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #252 | #265 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












