GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon 860M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅195.9% more average FPS across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.

Radeon 860M

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Radeon 860M

2025

Why buy it

✅195.9% more average FPS across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon 860M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB averages 195.9% more FPS across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 10,749 vs 4,838 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon 860M is a 2025 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 122.2% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 2 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $169 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 195.9% more estimated average FPS across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data and 122.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. Radeon 860M is the newer 2025 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (15W vs 70W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon 860M make more sense than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?

Yes. Radeon 860M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 70W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 3050 6GB currently gives you 122.2% higher G3D Mark and 195.9% more estimated average FPS across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

Radeon 860M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon 860M
1080p
low	109 FPS	46 FPS
medium	92 FPS	30 FPS
high	77 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	11 FPS
1440p
low	95 FPS	35 FPS
medium	81 FPS	20 FPS
high	59 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	30 FPS	12 FPS
medium	28 FPS	8 FPS
high	19 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	16 FPS	4 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon 860M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon 860M
1080p
low	174 FPS	97 FPS
medium	149 FPS	63 FPS
high	118 FPS	41 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	30 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	63 FPS
medium	106 FPS	32 FPS
high	83 FPS	24 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	18 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	25 FPS
medium	62 FPS	14 FPS
high	48 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	9 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon 860M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon 860M
1080p
low	484 FPS	218 FPS
medium	387 FPS	174 FPS
high	322 FPS	145 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	109 FPS
1440p
low	363 FPS	163 FPS
medium	290 FPS	131 FPS
high	242 FPS	109 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	242 FPS	109 FPS
medium	193 FPS	87 FPS
high	161 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	54 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon 860M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon 860M
1080p
low	243 FPS	182 FPS
medium	210 FPS	145 FPS
high	171 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	185 FPS	121 FPS
medium	166 FPS	99 FPS
high	131 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	64 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	72 FPS
medium	87 FPS	59 FPS
high	69 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	33 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon 860M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon 860M

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon 860M

The Radeon 860M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Marchar 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,838 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon 860M's 4,838 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 122.2%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon 860M uses RDNA 3.5, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 512 (Radeon 860M). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3.072 TFLOPS (Radeon 860M). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 3000 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8 (Radeon 860M) with 72 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon 860M
G3D Mark Score	10,749+122%	4,838
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	8 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	2304+350%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+121%	3.072 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1470 MHz	3000 MHz+104%
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	72+125%	32
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+3733%	0.06 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	18+125%	8

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 860M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon 860M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 860M has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1 MB (Radeon 860M) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon 860M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	168 GB/s	System
Bus Width	96-bit	System
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon 860M's 15W — a 129.4% difference. The Radeon 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Radeon 860M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.