
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

RADEON 9000
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RADEON 9000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RADEON 9000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RADEON 9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅8724.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 62231.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅4700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌366.7% higher power demand at 70W vs 15W.
RADEON 9000
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 70W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RADEON 9000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

RADEON 9000
The RADEON 9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RADEON 9000's 5 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 214880%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RADEON 9000 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,024 (RADEON 9000). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (RADEON 9000). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 16 (RADEON 9000) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+214880% | 5 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+125% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+14% | 5.939 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2900 MHz+97% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72+13% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+820% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18+13% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9000 carries 128 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 4700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 64-bit on the RADEON 9000.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+4700% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit+50% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RADEON 9000's 15W — a 129.4% difference. The RADEON 9000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (RADEON 9000). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 15W-79% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Legacy |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+51100% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the RADEON 9000 launched at $49. On MSRP, RADEON 9000 was 71% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9000) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 63500% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | RADEON 9000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $49-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+63500% | 0.1 |
| Codename | GA107 | Strix Point |
| Release | February 2 2024 | July 15 2024 |
| Ranking | #252 | #312 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














