
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon AI PRO R9700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,130 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 189% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon AI PRO R9700 across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Radeon AI PRO R9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅113.4% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌668.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,299 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon AI PRO R9700
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,130 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 189% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 22.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅113.4% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon AI PRO R9700 across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌668.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,299 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon AI PRO R9700 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 121 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 911 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 755 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 574 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 701 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 501 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 421 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 492 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 348 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 284 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 706 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 636 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 639 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 426 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 297 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon AI PRO R9700

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,589 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 28,589 — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 leads by 166%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4,096 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2920 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 64 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) with 72 Tensor cores vs 128.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749 | 28,589+166% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4096+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+606% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2920 MHz+99% |
| ROPs | 32 | 128+300% |
| TMUs | 72 | 256+256% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 64+256% |
| Tensor Cores | 72 | 128+78% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has 32 GB. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 offers 433.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8 MB (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the Radeon AI PRO R9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 32 GB+433% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 5.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon AI PRO R9700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | VCN 5.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | VCN 5.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon AI PRO R9700's 300W — a 124.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 650W (Radeon AI PRO R9700). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-77% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+61% | 95.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon AI PRO R9700 launched at $1299. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 87% less ($1130 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 22.0 (Radeon AI PRO R9700) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 189.1% better value. The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon AI PRO R9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-87% | $1299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+189% | 22.0 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 48 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #252 | #23 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












