
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+90.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 69.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 37.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
- ❌15900% longer card at 160mm vs 1mm.
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 160mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,637 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.6 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
2011Why buy it
- ✅+90.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 69.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 37.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $19 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 70W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 160mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌40% higher power demand at 70W vs 50W.
- ❌15900% longer card at 160mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,637 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.6 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 5 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 4 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 61 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 13 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,637 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire's 5,637 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 90.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire uses Terascale 2, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,920 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+91% | 5,637 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Terascale 2 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+20% | 1920 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 115.2 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) — a 45.8% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. Bus width: 96-bit vs 256-bit x2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s+46% | 115.2 GB/s x2 |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 256-bit x2+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 11_0 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire's 50W — a 33.3% difference. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 50W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+36% | 112.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire launched at $150. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire costs 11.2% less ($19 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 37.6 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 69.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $150-11% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+69% | 37.6 |
| Codename | GA107 | Blackcomb XT |
| Release | February 2 2024 | January 6 2011 |
| Ranking | #252 | #537 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












