
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Radeon HD 7400G
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon HD 7400G Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon HD 7400G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon HD 7400G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅1370.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 1091.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌62.8% higher power demand at 70W vs 43W.
Radeon HD 7400G
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $119 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 70W, a 27W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon HD 7400G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon HD 7400G
The Radeon HD 7400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 267 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon HD 7400G's 267 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 3925.8%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon HD 7400G uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7400G). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7400G). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2300 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 28 (Radeon HD 7400G) with 72 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 7400G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+3926% | 267 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+29% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS | 16.49 TFLOPS+143% |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz | 2300 MHz+56% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 112+56% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+360% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | 28+56% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7400G leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 7400G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7400G carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7400G.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 7400G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 128-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 7400G). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 7400G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+7% | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs None (Radeon HD 7400G). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon HD 7400G).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 7400G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (5th Gen) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (7th Gen) | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon HD 7400G's 43W — a 47.8% difference. The Radeon HD 7400G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7400G). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 7400G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W | 43W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+2377% | 6.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB came in at $169, while the Radeon HD 7400G launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7400G was 70.4% cheaper ($119 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 5.3 (Radeon HD 7400G) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1100% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 7400G (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 7400G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $50-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+1100% | 5.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 33 |
| Release | February 2 2024 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #252 | #229 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














