GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon HD 7700-serie

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅+466% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 432.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 11.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon HD 7700-serie

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,899 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Radeon HD 7700-serie

2012

Why buy it

✅+466% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 432.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 11.9 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,899 vs 10,749).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon HD 7700-serie?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,749 vs 1,899 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon HD 7700-serie is a 2012 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2012, 466.0% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 512 MB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is about 6.3% more expensive on MSRP at $169 MSRP versus $159 MSRP, and you are getting 466.0% higher G3D Mark. Radeon HD 7700-serie really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon HD 7700-serie still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon HD 7700-serie is 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM, 1,899 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 7700-serie Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD 7700-serie
1080p
low	85 FPS	85 FPS
medium	72 FPS	68 FPS
high	60 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	38 FPS
1440p
low	74 FPS	64 FPS
medium	64 FPS	51 FPS
high	47 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	28 FPS
4K
low	27 FPS	27 FPS
medium	25 FPS	26 FPS
high	17 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon HD 7700-serie

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD 7700-serie
1080p
low	174 FPS	85 FPS
medium	149 FPS	68 FPS
high	118 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	43 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	64 FPS
medium	106 FPS	51 FPS
high	83 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	32 FPS
medium	62 FPS	24 FPS
high	48 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon HD 7700-serie

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD 7700-serie
1080p
low	484 FPS	85 FPS
medium	387 FPS	68 FPS
high	322 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	43 FPS
1440p
low	363 FPS	64 FPS
medium	290 FPS	51 FPS
high	242 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	242 FPS	43 FPS
medium	193 FPS	34 FPS
high	161 FPS	28 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	21 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon HD 7700-serie

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD 7700-serie
1080p
low	243 FPS	73 FPS
medium	210 FPS	62 FPS
high	171 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	43 FPS
1440p
low	185 FPS	58 FPS
medium	166 FPS	50 FPS
high	131 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	41 FPS
medium	87 FPS	33 FPS
high	69 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	20 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon HD 7700-serie

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon HD 7700-serie

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon HD 7700-serie

The Radeon HD 7700-serie is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,899 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon HD 7700-serie's 1,899 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 466%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon HD 7700-serie uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7700-serie). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3.789 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7700-serie). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD 7700-serie
G3D Mark Score	10,749+466%	1,899
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 1.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2304+13%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+79%	3.789 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1470 MHz+59%	925 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	72	128+78%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+360%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 7700-serie relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD 7700-serie
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7700-serie has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 7700-serie) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD 7700-serie
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+1100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	168 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	96-bit	128-bit+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB+167%	0.75 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon HD 7700-serie's 250W — a 112.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 450W (Radeon HD 7700-serie). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD 7700-serie
TDP	70W-72%	250W
Recommended PSU	300W-33%	450W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Length	160mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	153.6+1921%	7.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 7700-serie launched at $159. The Radeon HD 7700-serie costs 5.9% less ($10 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 11.9 (Radeon HD 7700-serie) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 434.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2012).