
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8970M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅+177.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon HD 8970M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,876 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Radeon HD 8970M
2013Why buy it
- ✅+177.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,876 vs 10,749).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon HD 8970M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 8970M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 387 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 44 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon HD 8970M

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon HD 8970M
Radeon HD 8970M
The Radeon HD 8970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,876 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon HD 8970M's 3,876 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 177.3%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon HD 8970M uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8970M). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8970M). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,749+177% | 3,876 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+80% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.774 TFLOPS+194% | 2.304 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1470 MHz+63% | 900 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 72 | 80+11% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+642% | 0.31 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 8970M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8970M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8970M) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon HD 8970M's 100W — a 35.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8970M). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-30% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 153.6+296% | 38.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | Radeon HD 8970M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | — |
| Codename | GA107 | Neptune |
| Release | February 2 2024 | May 14 2013 |
| Ranking | #252 | #507 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












