GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon HD8970M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅100.7% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon HD8970M

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Radeon HD8970M

2013

Why buy it

✅100.7% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon HD8970M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB averages 100.7% more FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 10,749 vs 3,369 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon HD8970M is a 2013 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2013, 219.1% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 2 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $169 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 100.7% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data and 219.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon HD8970M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon HD8970M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

Radeon HD8970M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD8970M
1080p
low	85 FPS	77 FPS
medium	72 FPS	63 FPS
high	60 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	32 FPS
1440p
low	74 FPS	65 FPS
medium	64 FPS	53 FPS
high	47 FPS	37 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	23 FPS
4K
low	27 FPS	23 FPS
medium	25 FPS	22 FPS
high	17 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon HD8970M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD8970M
1080p
low	174 FPS	140 FPS
medium	149 FPS	105 FPS
high	118 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	49 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	96 FPS
medium	106 FPS	67 FPS
high	83 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	36 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	47 FPS
medium	62 FPS	35 FPS
high	48 FPS	27 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	18 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon HD8970M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD8970M
1080p
low	484 FPS	152 FPS
medium	387 FPS	121 FPS
high	322 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	76 FPS
1440p
low	363 FPS	114 FPS
medium	290 FPS	91 FPS
high	242 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	57 FPS
4K
low	242 FPS	76 FPS
medium	193 FPS	61 FPS
high	161 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	38 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon HD8970M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD8970M
1080p
low	243 FPS	141 FPS
medium	210 FPS	112 FPS
high	171 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	76 FPS
1440p
low	185 FPS	102 FPS
medium	166 FPS	83 FPS
high	131 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	55 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	60 FPS
medium	87 FPS	45 FPS
high	69 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon HD8970M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon HD8970M

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon HD8970M

The Radeon HD8970M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 14 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,369 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon HD8970M's 3,369 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 219.1%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon HD8970M uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD8970M). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon HD8970M). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 900 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD8970M
G3D Mark Score	10,749+219%	3,369
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 1.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2304+80%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+194%	2.304 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1470 MHz+63%	900 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	72	80+11%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+642%	0.31 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD8970M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD8970M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD8970M has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD8970M) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon HD8970M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	168 GB/s	System
Bus Width	96-bit	System
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon HD8970M's 100W — a 35.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Radeon HD8970M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.