G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅+59.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 85W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro 5500M

2019

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,730 vs 10,749).
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌21.4% higher power demand at 85W vs 70W.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Radeon Pro 5500M

2019

Why buy it

✅+59.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 85W, a 15W reduction.

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,730 vs 10,749).
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌21.4% higher power demand at 85W vs 70W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than Radeon Pro 5500M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 59.7% higher PassMark G3D performance and DLSS 2 Super Resolution. It also comes from 2024 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019, 59.7% more raw performance headroom, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $169 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 59.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro 5500M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro 5500M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 5500M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon Pro 5500M
1080p
low	109 FPS	129 FPS
medium	92 FPS	111 FPS
high	77 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	55 FPS
1440p
low	95 FPS	114 FPS
medium	81 FPS	96 FPS
high	59 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	41 FPS
4K
low	30 FPS	41 FPS
medium	28 FPS	37 FPS
high	19 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	16 FPS	19 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon Pro 5500M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon Pro 5500M
1080p
low	174 FPS	126 FPS
medium	149 FPS	91 FPS
high	118 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	43 FPS
1440p
low	129 FPS	84 FPS
medium	106 FPS	52 FPS
high	83 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	28 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	40 FPS
medium	62 FPS	28 FPS
high	48 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	16 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon Pro 5500M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon Pro 5500M
1080p
low	484 FPS	303 FPS
medium	387 FPS	242 FPS
high	322 FPS	202 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	151 FPS
1440p
low	363 FPS	227 FPS
medium	290 FPS	182 FPS
high	242 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	114 FPS
4K
low	242 FPS	151 FPS
medium	193 FPS	121 FPS
high	161 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	76 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon Pro 5500M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon Pro 5500M
1080p
low	243 FPS	263 FPS
medium	210 FPS	230 FPS
high	171 FPS	195 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	151 FPS
1440p
low	185 FPS	197 FPS
medium	166 FPS	175 FPS
high	131 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	109 FPS	109 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	107 FPS
medium	87 FPS	88 FPS
high	69 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	56 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Open Radeon Pro 5500M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon Pro 5500M

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon Pro 5500M

The Radeon Pro 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,730 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon Pro 5500M's 6,730 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 59.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500M). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500M). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1450 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon Pro 5500M
G3D Mark Score	10,749+60%	6,730
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	8 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2304+50%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.774 TFLOPS+52%	4.454 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1470 MHz+1%	1450 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	72	96+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5500M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon Pro 5500M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5500M has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 5500M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon Pro 5500M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	96-bit	128-bit+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon Pro 5500M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500M). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5500M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon Pro 5500M
Encoder	NVENC (5th Gen)	VCN 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC (7th Gen)	VCN 2.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon Pro 5500M's 85W — a 19.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5500M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB	Radeon Pro 5500M
TDP	70W-18%	85W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85
Perf/Watt	153.6+94%	79.2