GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs Radeon PRO W7700

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W7700

2023Core: 1900 MHzBoost: 2600 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 175.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 23.1 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • Draws 70W instead of 190W, a 120W reduction.
  • Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7700 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W7700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Radeon PRO W7700

2023

Why buy it

  • 111.2% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
  • 491.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.1 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • 171.4% higher power demand at 190W vs 70W.
  • 66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W7700 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Yes. Radeon PRO W7700 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon PRO W7700 averages 111.2% more FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 23,062 vs 10,749 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon PRO W7700 is a 2023 card with FSR upscaling, while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W7700 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 114.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 16 GB instead of 6 GB, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020), and a 5nm process instead of 8nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon PRO W7700 is about 491.1% more expensive on MSRP at $999 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and you are getting 111.2% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data and 114.6% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon PRO W7700 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Radeon PRO W7700?
Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (70W vs 190W), and staying closer to $169 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon PRO W7700. The trade-off is that Radeon PRO W7700 currently gives you 114.6% higher G3D Mark and 111.2% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7700
1080p
low85 FPS223 FPS
medium72 FPS205 FPS
high60 FPS179 FPS
ultra40 FPS163 FPS
1440p
low74 FPS201 FPS
medium64 FPS167 FPS
high47 FPS139 FPS
ultra30 FPS130 FPS
4K
low27 FPS136 FPS
medium25 FPS114 FPS
high17 FPS91 FPS
ultra15 FPS84 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7700
1080p
low174 FPS561 FPS
medium149 FPS462 FPS
high118 FPS360 FPS
ultra87 FPS302 FPS
1440p
low129 FPS369 FPS
medium106 FPS305 FPS
high83 FPS248 FPS
ultra62 FPS210 FPS
4K
low74 FPS168 FPS
medium62 FPS138 FPS
high48 FPS115 FPS
ultra34 FPS91 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7700
1080p
low484 FPS911 FPS
medium387 FPS741 FPS
high322 FPS644 FPS
ultra242 FPS519 FPS
1440p
low363 FPS704 FPS
medium290 FPS567 FPS
high242 FPS481 FPS
ultra181 FPS389 FPS
4K
low242 FPS492 FPS
medium193 FPS395 FPS
high161 FPS329 FPS
ultra121 FPS259 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7700
1080p
low243 FPS785 FPS
medium210 FPS653 FPS
high171 FPS591 FPS
ultra144 FPS506 FPS
1440p
low185 FPS622 FPS
medium166 FPS517 FPS
high131 FPS463 FPS
ultra109 FPS389 FPS
4K
low104 FPS399 FPS
medium87 FPS346 FPS
high69 FPS318 FPS
ultra55 FPS259 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and Radeon PRO W7700

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

AMD

Radeon PRO W7700

The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 23,062 — the Radeon PRO W7700 leads by 114.6%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48 (Radeon PRO W7700) with 72 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7700
G3D Mark Score
10,749
23,062+115%
Architecture
Ampere
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
8 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2304
3072+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS
31.95 TFLOPS+372%
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
2600 MHz+77%
ROPs
32
96+200%
TMUs
72
192+167%
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+207%
0.75 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
18
48+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7700
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7700 has 16 GB. The Radeon PRO W7700 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) — a 157.1% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7700. Bus width: 96-bit vs 192-bit.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7700
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
16 GB+167%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
432 GB/s+157%
Bus Width
96-bit
192-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7700
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7700
Encoder
NVENC (5th Gen)
VCN 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC (7th Gen)
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 190W — a 92.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 550W (Radeon PRO W7700). Power connectors: None vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7700
TDP
70W-63%
190W
Recommended PSU
300W-45%
550W
Power Connector
None
1x 8-pin
Length
160mm
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
153.6+27%
121.4
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7700 launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 83.1% less ($830 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 175.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRadeon PRO W7700
MSRP
$169-83%
$999
Performance per Dollar
63.6+175%
23.1
Codename
GA107
Navi 32
Release
February 2 2024
November 13 2023
Ranking
#252
#52